Category: Opinion

Monster squid washes up on popular beach…

A MONSTER 4.2 metre-long squid has washed up on the shores of New Zealand’s capital.

Three brothers were out for a morning dive in Wellington when they came across the impressive creature.

Daniel, Jack and Matthew Aplin were driving along on a track near Red Rocks on the city’s South Coast when they came across the beached cephalopods.

The brothers said they had come across sharks while on their diving trips but had never seen a squid of that size.

The trio contacted the National Institute of Water and Atmospheric Research, who arranged to have the squid collected.

A Department of Conservation spokesman said it was almost certainly a giant squid, the bodies of which washed up relatively regularly.

Male giant squids can grow as large as 10 metres long, and have suckers and barbs running down the length of their arms.

The giant squid is the largest type of squid save for the colossal squid.

They are chiefly hunted by sperm whales, but juveniles are occasionally hunted by deep-sea sharks.

Rumours and sightings of giant squid as long as 20.1 metres are widespread, but no specimens approaching this size have been scientifically documented.

Studies show giant squid feed on deep-sea fish and other squid species.

They catch prey using two tentacles, gripping it with serrated sucker rings, then bring it toward the powerful beak, and shred it before ingesting it.

Giant squid inhabit all the world’s oceans and are believed to be solitary hunters, as only individuals have ever been caught in fishing nets.

An online commenter compared the brothers’ find to the colossal squid held at New Zealand’s national museum Te Papa in Wellington — which is over 5.2 metres long.

Last year a 15.2 metre squid washed up in Indonesia.

This story originally appeared on The Sun and has been republished here with permission.

Source link


Summer Snow Blankets Montana, Idaho, Wyoming…

Source link


Life Without Water: Sweaty, Smelly, and Furious in Caracas…

(Bloomberg) — Editors Note: There are few places as chaotic or dangerous as Venezuela. “Life in Caracas” is a series of short stories that seeks to capture the surreal quality of living in a land in total disarray.

When I’m lucky, a trickle flows though my apartment building’s rickety pipes. When I’m really lucky, they deliver as much as 30-straight minutes worth of H2O. That’s enough to fill up the 200-or-so-gallon tank in my kitchen and trigger a celebration.

I’ll do something crazy and run the water until it gets really hot before I jump into the shower.

The tank is hooked up to the building’s distribution system, so I don’t have to be present to collect the precious liquid. In past rentals, I had no net. I did the mad Caracas water dash when the pipes mysteriously started flowing while I was home. I’d fill buckets, pots, coffee mugs—anything.

True enough, in Caracas, we go without reliable access to an extensive list of basic life essentials, from toilet paper to toothpaste. But if you ask me, dry taps are by far the most unpleasant of the epic shortages.

Dishes are brushed off and reused, and clothing is not something regularly laundered, though, personally, I draw the line at multiple wearings of underwear or socks. You ask friends whether it’s okay to flush. You often do not. We’re sweaty and, yes, smelly, especially in the rainy season when the humidity can top 80 percent. We’re at risk, too, because water stagnating in the vessels that people stash around their homes attracts mosquitoes; malaria rates have soared.

The poorest, as usual, have it the worst, though no one is spared. Hospitals and schools, posh neighborhoods and slums, they all go without water—at times for weeks on end—making this man-made drought arguably the most equalizing disaster the socialist government has ever managed to engineer.

There’s solidarity in our sticky existence, which is born of crumbling infrastructure. We’re not ashamed to ask to use an acquaintance’s shower, and banging on doors in the wee hours to sound the alert that water has suddenly started flowing isn’t annoying but proof you’re a good neighbor. In a deeply divided nation, protesters of all political stripes have taken to the streets to block traffic and hoist signs saying “Water is a Right.”

For the super-wealthy, a somewhat effective solution has been found. They now dig their own wells. Those a rung or two below them pay to have water trucked in daily by companies that collect it from springs in the surrounding mountains. The needy flock to the springs themselves. They’ll pile children and bottles and tubs into rickety old cars each weekend to make the drive over. And once the containers are filled and the kids are bathed, they head back home.

Source link



5TH UPDATE, Sunday AM Writethru following Saturday and Friday updates. For most recent Sunday update click hereWe’ve frequently written about the wane of raunchy comedies recently at the box office, often blaming streaming for encroaching on the genre’s theatrical territory and stealing away such talent as Adam Sandler.

STX Entertainment’s bawdy R-rated Melissa McCarthy-puppet comedy, The Happytime Murders, which was willed into existence over the last ten years, looked to be a game changer on paper as well as in that hysterical red band trailer. But the Brian Henson-directed title was dead and wrapped in plastic with a $10M opening, according to STX’s numbers this morning.  Some rivals see it much lower at $9.6M-$9.7M after an STX-reported Saturday that was down 15% from Friday’s $3.95M for $3.3M. All in, Happytime Murders reps McCarthy’s lowest wide opening ever for one of her solo films – not counting St. Vincent, which was a platform release. Happytime Murders’ opening is even lower than McCarthy’s May PG-13 title Life of the Party ($17.9M), which we thought was rock bottom.

The Happytime Murders


But rather than blame the raunchy comedy B.O. recession, or Warner Bros. one-two power August punch of Crazy Rich Asians and The Meg, which respectively made $25M and $13M this weekend, there appeared to be a missed opportunity here with The Happytime Murders by both STX and McCarthy. Out of all the comedies this year, this one looked fresh, and quite different for McCarthy. But the movie was never propped up as a summer comedy event by STX for reasons we’ll explain soon.

Personally, I thought Happytime was very funny. But with comedy being subjective, I’m sure for others the project stands as a fine line between brilliance and career shark-jumping. The development of Happytime Murders at the Jim Henson Co. was first announced in 2008, followed by Lionsgate fast-tracking the project in 2011. Cameron Diaz and Katherine Heigl once circled the project. Then Universal’s foul-mouthed teddy bear comedy Ted happened in 2012, earning $218.8M stateside, and over a half- billion worldwide. The success of Ted revived hope for Happytime, and when the project went into turnaround, STX scooped up the rights in July 2015. Jamie Foxx, at one point, was in talks to play opposite former puppet-cop-turned-P.I. Phil Philips (Bill Barretta) before McCarthy took over.

The pic, which STX says cost a reported $40M (we’ve heard $47M), was funded by financiers and foreign sales, with STX reducing their exposure. We heard repeatedly today from reliable sources that McCarthy received a very notable payday here, some say at least $10M, while others say as high $17.5M. Now, with a foreign sales-funded movie, it’s par for the course for a talent’s paycheck to rep the majority of the film’s budget. The front-end salary is also an advance against profit participation, so that the star has an incentive to promote the movie. McCarthy also provided some uncredited rewrites, too, on Happytime. Mark Wahlberg also incurred an eight-figure payday on Mile 22, which has a budget between $50M-$60M before P&A, as that was also a foreign-sales structured production. The action dud is seeing a second FSS of $6M, -56%. Since STX was selling foreign rights, they needed a star to get Happytime off the ground.

Studios will never throw good money after bad, and before we blame STX for falling short of propping this movie up as a summer event, know that McCarthy and co-star Elizabeth Banks were largely unavailable for the promotion of Happytime Murders. McCarthy has been busy finishing her New Line comedy Superintelligence, further compounded by the fact that the late night shows are on late summer hiatus. The video materials online of McCarthy and Banks are from an EPK kit, and there was no premiere, as neither star was in town.


Given the above, it comes as no surprise to hear that STX didn’t shell out that much on TV spots.  We heard there was a great test screening for the film, but CinemaScore audiences shot Happytime Murders to the ground with a C-., which is lower than the C+s that McCarthy earned for The Boss and for Tammy. On PostTrak, Happytime earned two stars and an awful 58% overall positive, so STX had to know on some level that Happytime wasn’t going to keep audiences smiling. While STX prides itself on being thrifty with their P&A, they had reason to cheap out on their TV spend, since the talent wasn’t around to prop the movie. iSpot estimates that STX shelled out $5.2M for TV ads, which is lower than what they’ve spent on their previous comedies, read Bad Moms ($15.8M), Bad Moms Christmas ($11.6M), and I Feel Pretty ($5.9M), and way lower than what Warner Bros. spent on Life of the Party ($16.3M), which McCarthy actually took time out to promote. Tracking showed slightly more females than males, but men over 25 at 39% were the biggest draw, followed by women 25+ at 25%, and then men under 25 at 21%.

STX tried to spread things around digitally, like a faux PSA about puppets being addicted to syrup (7.3M views), plus they cut a very raunchy, hysterical first trailer. But overall, social media monitor RelishMix reports that Happytime‘s social media universe of 61M across Facebook, Twitter, YouTube views, etc. is “half of the typical R-rated targeted comedy, which usually has a social media universe of 123M,” plus the viral rate for the pic’s videos was at 8:1, versus the average 12:1 for an R-rated comedy. Making matters worse, McCarthy’s Twitter and Instagram mention nothing about Happytime, nor does Banks’s Twitter.

Sausage Party received a sweet launch at San Diego Comic-Con two years ago, complete with an advance screening that had attendees falling out of their seats, coupled with Seth Rogen and a wide array of talent appearing for a fan Q&A afterwards. Happytime Murders skipped such obvious stunting at SDCC, and the reason why is because we heard that the pic was still being edited, which is also why its release date was pushed by a week. Based on the exit scores, it’s clear that Happytime was never quite ready. Also, as much as August can be a launchpad for groundbreaking cinematic work like Inglourious Basterds, Crazy Rich Asians, and Hell or High Water, it also doubles as a dumping ground that some studios have no confidence in it at all.


Other marketing for Happytime Murders was hodge-podge. There was a very unique pop-up puppet bar at the InkHole off of Hollywood Blvd. But, man, those billboards and outdoor posters looked like they were made from an amateur Photoshop graphic artist. In no way did STX employ a creative approach to accentuating and selling the uniqueness of Happytime like Sony and Annapurna, which made their Sausage Party truly sing.

Over the last two weeks, Warner Bros. has approached the marketing for The Meg and Crazy Rich Asians like they were planning for D-Day, going the distance to correlate local digital pushes with local box office grosses so as to target casual moviegoers who fall outside both movies’ hardcore demos. The results of their sweat are evident in ticket sales for both movies.

Many will easily blame the 24% Rotten Tomatoes score as another Happytime hurdleHorror can sometimes survive bad RT scores; R-rated comedies cannot.

However, STX here, with Happytime Murders sans talent availability, arguably had no reason to overspend in promoting the film; rather, just hoped to break even and cut their losses. I heard a $15M+ opening could have easily brought this movie into the black. Seventy percent of Happytime‘s estimated $47M budget was reportedly covered by foreign sales and financing, and after stateside P&A, leaves STX with an exposure in the upper $30Ms.

Criticizes one film packager about the situation, “Stars could have been available. Conflicts occur on every picture, and the stars here wanted to distance themselves from promoting Happytime Murders.

Agents and distributors remain hopeful that raunchy laughs will rise again at the box office. Just look at how Crazy Rich Asians rebooted the romantic comedy. Comedy is generational, built on stars, and some believe that the current funk for R-rated titles is attributed to the fact that we’re between generations now. Jim Carrey, Ben Stiller, and Adam Sandler have grown up, and the younger audience has yet to dial into a new fresh batch of talent. Next year, The Hangover turns 10. If there’s a ray of sunshine left this year, it’s in Tiffany Haddish and Kevin Hart, who have Night School opening on Sept. 28

Global Road on its knees has the Lakeshore co-production A.X.L.and the film is essentially on the marquee for contractual fulfillment, bottoming out at $2.9M per the distributor’s figures and two stars on PostTrak. Deadline’s Mike Fleming and Andreas Wiseman reported that the robot dog movie has an estimated exposure of $10M for the upside down film distributor. Those CinemaScore audiences who showed up to watch it didn’t entirely hate it, with a B+, but PostTrak shows another story of 59% overall positive and two-and-half stars.

Bleecker Street

On the specialty side, Sony’s Asian-American indie thriller Searching drew $123K on Friday, on its way to $360K at nine theaters for a solid screen average of $40K. Bleecker Street has their TIFF acquisition from last year, a remake of Papillon starring Rami Malek and Charlie Hunnam. At 544 locations, the pic is on its way to $1.1M.


We posted our Sunday box office update separately, but while you’re here, this is the studio-reported weekend B.O. as of Sunday morning:

thumb rank film dist scrs(chg) fri sat sun 3-day total week
1 Crazy Rich Asians WB 3,526 (+142) $7M $10.3M $7.7M $25M (-6%) $76.8M 2
2 The Meg WB 4,031 (-87) $3.3M $5.7M $4M $13M (-38%) $105.3M 3
3 Happytime Murders STX 3,256 $3.9M $3.3M $2.7M $10M $10M 1
4 M:I – Fallout Par/Sky 3,052 (-430) $2.3M $3.4M  $2.2M $8M (-26%) $193.9M 5
5 Christopher Robin Dis 3,394 (-208) $1.6M $2.8M $1.9M $6.3M (-28%) $77.6M 4
6 Mile 22 STX 3,520 $1.6M $2.6M  $1.7M $6M
$25.1M 2
7 alpha S8/Sony 2,179 $1.6M $2.3M  $1.6M $5.6M (-46%) $20.1M 2
8 BlacKkKlansman Focus 1,914 (+126) $1.4M $2.1M $1.7M $5.3M (-28%) $32M 3
9 A.X.L. GR/Lake 1,710 $821K $1.2M $907K $2.9M  $2.9M 1
10 Slender Man Sony 2,065 (-293) $780K $1.2M $750K  $2.7M (-42%) $25.4M 3


Industry estimates for the weekend of Aug. 24-26 as of Saturday AM:

thumb rank film dis. screens (chg) fri 3-day (-%) total wk
1 Crazy Rich Asians WB 3,526 (+142) $7M (-4%) $25M (-6%)  $76.8M 2
2 The Meg WB 4,031 (-87) $3.3M (-43%) $12.2M (-42%) $104.4M 3
3 The Happytime Murders STX 3,256 $3.9M $10.2M  $10.2M 1
4 M:I – Fallout Par/Sky 3,052 (-430) $2.2M (-27%) $8M (-25%) $193.9M 5
5 Mile 22 STX 3,520 $1.7M (-67%) $5.9M (-56%) $25M 2
6 Alpha S8/Sony 2,719 $1.6M (-52%) $5.8M (-44%) $20.4M 2
7 Christopher Robin Dis 3,394 (-208) $1.6M (-38%) $5.6M (-37%) $76.8M 4
8 BlacKkKlansman Foc 1,914 (+126) $1.4M (-29%) $5.1M (-31%) $31.8M 3
9 slender Man Sony 2,065 (-293) $787K (-44%) $2.6M (-46%)  $25.2M 3
10 A.X.L. GR 1,710 $815K $2.48M $2.48M 1

2ND UPDATE, FRIDAY MIDDAY: At this point in time, industry matinees show Warner Bros. Crazy Rich Asians prevailing over STX’s The Happytime Murders, with $21M-$23M, -18% for weekend 2 on its way to $74.8M on the high end. Crazy Rich Asians is bound for a $6M Friday.

Warner Bros.

The Happytime Murders is eyeing $11M-$13M after a $950K start last night. Friday is projected at $4.5M. Truth be told, gotta give this R-rated pic a shot to leg out until tonight as the stoners and young folk head to late showtimes. Warner Bros. The Meg is looking to take third behind Happytime, however, there’s a chance it could outstrip as it’s landing in the same weekend bandwidth. By Sunday, on the high end, Meg could reach $105M+

Paramount/Skydance’s Mission: Impossible – Fallout is heading for 4th with $7.3M in weekend 5, -32%, which would put the Tom Cruise pic at $193.2M by Sunday.

Disney’s Christopher Robin is No. 5 in weekend 4 with an estimated $6M, -32%, with $77.2M by Sunday.

Global Road’s robotic dog A.X.L. is going to the dogs with a forecasted $700K today, $2.1M opening.


1ST UPDATE, FRIDAY 7:10AM: STX Entertainment’s R-rated Melissa McCarthy puppet comedy The Happytime Murdersone of summer’s last wide releases, collected $950K previews at 2,500 locations.

That’s a better result than McCarthy’s PG-13 comedy Life of the Party back in May, which posted a $700K Thursday night from 2,900 locations on its way to a $4.9M Friday and $17.9M opening weekend. The pic, directed by McCarthy’s husband Ben Falcone, off a B CinemaScore wound up with a 2.9 multiple stateside with $52.8M. Happytime Murders’ Thursday night isn’t that far from McCarthy’s R-rated The Boss from April 2016, which drew $985K at 2,533 theaters and continued on to a $8M Friday, $23.5M weekend. Too soon to tell if Happytime even smiles that wide. Unlike Sausage Party which was propelled by young males, females on tracking have the edge here with Happytime given McCarthy’s fanbase. Other McCarthy preview nights include Ghostbusters (PG-13, $3.4M), Spy (R, $1.5M), and the Sandra Bullock cop comedy The Heat (R, $1M), Happytime Murders expands to 3,256 theaters today. The Brian Henson-directed comedy cost $40M before P&A with a consortium of financiers.

Despite the entry of Happytime Murders, which is expected to earn $13M-$15M, Warner Bros.’ multi-generational hit romantic comedy Crazy Rich Asians is expected to remain golden in its second weekend with $16M-$18M, -36%, for a running total by Sunday of $69.8M. On Thursday, the Jon M. Chu film grossed $3.6M, -2% from Wednesday for a nine-day total of $51.8M.

Definitely by Sunday, possibly by Saturday, Warner Bros./China Gravity’s The Meg will cross $100M, becoming Jason Statham’s sixth starring role feature to do so. Yesterday, Meg earned $1.4M, -23% from Wednesday for a current running total of $92.3M.

Following bad news at Global Road that the banks have taken over their domestic theatrical production and distribution ops, they’re opening robot dog movie A.X.L. (what does that even mean?) at 1,695 theaters with an expected disastrous result of $2M-$3M.

STX’s Mile 22 ended its first week with $19.1M, after a $1M Thursday, -6% from Wednesday. Lower down the charts, Studio 8/Sony’s Alpha grossed $715K last night, -32% from Wednesday, for a $14.5M first week.

Sony has in limited release Searching in 9 venues; an unconventional thriller that Sony Pictures Worldwide Acquisition snapped up at Sundance (when it was titled Search). The studio will go wider with the title on Aug. 31. Pic marks the feature directorial debut of 27-year-old Asian American helmer Aneesh Chaganty, and stars a largely Asian cast. In Searching, John Cho plays a desperate father whose 16-year-old daughter goes missing; he breaks into her laptop to search for clues.

Crazy Rich Asians star Henry Golding and director Chu are supporting Searching and promoting a #GoldOpen for the movie and buying out a theater so that audiences can see it.


Source link


The Communist Who Launched Keith Ellison's Career…

Keith Ellison’s political career began with controversy over his links to the Nation of Islam’s Louis Farrakhan, connections that continues to dog him to the present day despite his repeated disavowals. But less commonly known is another radical association of Ellison’s: a decade-long relationship with Marxist University of Minnesota professor and 1974 Communist Party gubernatorial candidate in Minnesota, Erwin Marquit. Marquit helped launch Ellison’s national political career in 2006 using Marquit’s political connections, anti-war associations, personal donations, and hosting at least four fundraisers over the years for Ellison in the Marquit home near Cedar Lake in the Bryn Mawr section of Minneapolis.

Marquit, the “state’s best-known Communist” according to a Minneapolis Star-Tribune profile published shortly before Marquit’s death from cancer in 2015, openly supported Ellison from the start. In his Memoirs of a Lifelong Communist, Marquit wrote that he and his wife Doris actively solicited backing for Ellison as early as May 2006, sought signatures for a letter of support for Ellison that was circulated among anti-Iraq war activists, and hosted the first fundraiser for Ellison in their home in July 2006. Marquit also went door-to-door for Ellison, also described in his memoirs:

When someone appeared at the door, I would begin by introducing myself by name. I was not surprised when one of the first responses I got was, “Oh, you’re the Communist at the University of Minnesota.” Two or three others recognized me in a similar manner. The fact that I was campaigning for Ellison did not seem to bother any of them.

Neighbors of the Marquits, Dave Holets and his wife Nancy Arneson, signed on as co-hosts for the fundraisers. Holets told THE WEEKLY STANDARD that he himself was not that familiar with Ellison at the time, but agreed to co-host at Marquit’s request. He recalls helping Marquit post flyers on the doors of neighboring houses announcing the fundraisers and said about 40-50 people attended. Holets says Marquit told him that he attended marches for various social causes with Ellison during that time.

One of the attendees of a December 2013 Ellison fundraiser was an 18-year-old high school senior named Matthew Voges. Voges, now a law student in Boston, told TWS that although he became a conservative during his college years, he was himself then a member of the Communist party, an eager upcoming Marxist, and Erwin Marquit was his mentor. “Many Communist party members were in attendance [at the fundraiser,] although I don’t believe all of the attendees were Communists,” Voges said.

In contemporaneous notes Voges made of the 2013 fundraiser, which he shared with TWS, Voges wrote:

The private DFL [Minnesota Democratic–Farmer–Labor Party, a Democratic Party affiliate] fundraiser was held at a sprawling house in the wealthy part of Minneapolis proper … I had come to meet Keith Ellison, the U.S. Representative for Minnesota’s 5th district and the first Muslim congressman. My invite came through the host, prolific Communist Party member and professor emeritus Erwin Marquit.

Voges wrote that after Ellison made his entrance, various members of Minneapolis’s “left-wing intelligentsia arrived,” though he could not recall names of the attendees. He said that Ellison frequently referred to him (Voges) during his talk about campaign issues “as the tie-in to my generation.” After the fundraiser, Voges volunteered for the Ellison campaign for several months, manning phones and attending several other campaign events, but still being in high school, he said his participation was limited.

Voges shared a copy of an email announcing the December 2013 house party to which Erwin Marquit invited Voges. A partial screenshot of the email is below:

The email continues:

Join me for a conversation on US foreign policy across the world and ways we can restore America’s standing abroad and foster more respectful relationships with the world’s nations.

There will be refreshments, and no charge at the door; all are welcome. (An opportunity will be offered to contribute to Ellison for Congress)

Click here to RSVP online. You can also RSVP by calling or emailing Dinah Dale, Finance Director, at or 612.522.4416.

Hope to see you on the 17th!


(The address shown in the email for the Marquit home matches the address in the Federal Election Commission records reporting Marquit’s Ellison donations.)

Ellison, of course, went on to win his party’s nomination as well as the general election in 2006. Marquit recorded that “Doris and I, again with Dave [Holets] and Nancy [Arneson], have since held three more fundraisers in our home for Ellison, in May 2009, September, 2011 and December 2013.” FEC records show that over the course of a decades, Marquit personally donated more than $6,500 to Ellison in addition to the donations Marquit solicited from others.

Although there is not a lot of evidence that Ellison and Marquit socialized together, Marquit noted that one way Ellison expressed his appreciation for Marquit’s support was a surprise drop-in at his August 2006 80th birthday party. “I was surprised when Keith Ellison, who had been tipped off about the party, dropped by to extend birthday wishes,” Marquit wrote. But despite the relationship, Ellison does not mention Marquit in his 2014 book My Country, ‘Tis of Thee: My Faith, My Family, Our Future.

Although Erwin Marquit died in 2015, Minnesota’s “best-known Communist” helped Keith Ellison, now the No. 2 official at the Democratic National Committee and current candidate for attorney general in Minnesota, in no fewer than five campaigns, including Ellison’s inaugural run that set in motion his rise to national prominence. During that time period, Marquit still occasionally wrote for the website of the Communist Party USA, and Marquit was a delegate to the National Convention of the Communist Party USA right up through 2014, the year before his death.

Though Ellison has tried to distance himself repeatedly from Louis Farrakhan and the Nation of Islam, the congressman has never distanced himself from Marquit or from the support and donations provided by one of better-known Communists in the country. Along with Ellison’s penchant for defending cop-killers, namely Sharif Willis, Mumia Abu-Jamal, and Assata Shakur, Ellison’s relationships with Farrakhan and Marquit cement his reputation as a radical’s radical.

Ellison’s office did not respond to repeated requests for comment on his relationship with the late Communist party member Erwin Marquit.

Source link


WEEKEND: Dems fight over superdelegates…

WEEKEND: Dems fight over superdelegates...

(Second column, 11th story, link)

Advertise here

Source link


iPhone X racism row; Face ID fails to distinguish between Chinese users…

Apple has been accused of racism, amid reports that the Face ID authentication technology on its new iPhone X is failing to distinguish between Chinese users.

A man from Shanghai bought his wife the new gadget soon after it was released last month, but she was shocked to discover it could be unlocked by her teenage son.

The man, identified only by his surname Liu, phoned Apple’s customer service hotline to report the problem.

“Our son was using it and didn’t know the password”, he said, according to Shandong TV Station .

He was told it was an isolated case and was due to the fact his wife and son look very similar. However, Apple has reportedly launched an investigation into the Liu family’s claims.

This is not the first reported incident of Chinese users being able to unlock each other’s iPhone Xs.

Last week, AsiaOne reported that a woman from Nanjing discovered her colleague was able to unlock her phone using Face ID.

When Madam Yan first called Apple’s hotline to complain about the problem, the customer service representative told her it was “impossible”.

However, when pair took the phone to the store to prove what had happened, they found they could unlock all the phones in the store.

“We look quite ordinary. What if someone picks up my phone and opens it?” said Madam Yan’s colleague, Madam Wan.

“Then they could buy stuff through my phone and make payments. We don’t have any sense of security.”

Apple claims the probability that a random person in the population could look at your iPhone X and unlock it using Face ID is approximately one in a million. However, there are some caveats.

If you have a twin or a sibling who looks very similar to you, the probability of a false match is higher.

It is also higher for children under the age of 13, because their distinct facial features may not have fully developed, according to Apple.

The company claims to have worked with people all over the world to ensure the product accessible to people of different ethnicities.

“We worked with participants from around the world to include a representative group of people accounting for gender, age, ethnicity, and other factors,” said Cynthia Hogan , Apple’s vice president of public policy for the Americas, in October.

“We augmented the studies as needed to provide a high degree of accuracy for a diverse range of users.”

Source link


University Considers 'Whistling' Sex Harassment…

At Tennessee State, ‘whistling in a suggestive manner’ may lead to expulsion

Tennessee State University warns against “whistling in a suggestive manner” on the grounds that it may constitute sexual harassment, a policy that has helped earn it a “red light” rating from one of the nation’s premier college watchdog groups.

The public university in Nashville currently holds a “red light” rating from the Foundation for Individual Rights in Education for several of its policies that effectively allow officials to punish various forms of free speech as harassment.

Among them, the public university’s discrimination and harassment policy warns employees and students that “whistling in a suggestive manner” could get them sanctioned — including being expelled or fired — if officials deem the tune sexual harassment.

Other examples of possible sexual harassment listed under the policy include “suggestive or insulting sounds,” “suggestive or obscene gestures,” “unnecessary touching or brushing against the body,” jokes about sex inside and outside the classroom and more.

In sum, there are at least 20 different ways students and employees can be found guilty of sexual harassment, according to the policy. Campus officials state they will consider the “totality of the circumstances” before deeming whether an act is sexual harassment.

The College Fix reached out multiple times to the school’s media relations department for comment and clarification on the policies. No representatives from the school responded.

Multiple attempts were also made to speak to the university’s Title IX coordinator to ask whether suggestive whistling was a significant problem on campus. These requests were also ignored.

FIRE’s vice president of policy research Samantha Harris told The College Fix in a telephone interview that one problem with the policy is its vagueness.

“Very broad categories of speech are banned as harassment, simply because someone might find them suggestively offensive, and that’s something that courts have repeatedly held violates the first amendment,” Harris said.

In addition to the university’s ban on suggestive whistling, Harris criticized the policy’s prohibitions on jokes, humor and “inappropriate communication.”

“That could really be applied against core political speech, and speech and humor on social and political issues, and really just used to suppress unpopular speech,” she said.

Harris also pointed out the university’s policies regarding dissent and protest. The relevant policy reads in part: “Group dissent taking the form of demonstrations, marching, or sit-in activities will not be permitted inside university buildings or during university-wide events such as athletic contests, convocations, special lectures, assemblies… .”

“By banning any kind of demonstration during ‘university-wide events’ you’re really restricting students’ rights to protest and get their message across,” Harris said.

The same assembly policy also requires that “dissent” be registered with the vice president of student affairs, who will “ensure that the event is held at an acceptable time and appropriate site.” Harris said that this constitutes a “prior restraint on speech.”

FIRE rates schools’ speech policies on a green-yellow-red light scale, where red indicates the school has “at least one policy that clearly and substantially restricts speech.” Both the discrimination and harassment guidelines, and protest and demonstration policies at Tennessee State, have been given red light designations by the organization.

Campus free speech issues have been in the news frequently over the past few years, and sexual harassment has often been at the center.

Northwestern professor Laura Kipnis was recently forced to fend off a Title IX investigation in response to an essay she wrote about sexual paranoia on campus.

And J. Martin Rochester, a professor at the University of MIssouri-St. Louis was subject to a Title IX investigation for having vehement disagreements with female coworkers.

MORE: Cornell may crack down on free speech in wake of racial unrest

MORE: Sexual assault includes ‘whistling,’ ‘unwanted phrases’ at UC Santa Barbara

IMAGE: Ollyy /

Like The College Fix on Facebook / Follow us on Twitter

Source link

Why do Democrats want people to be victims?

Las Vegas shooter, Stephen Paddock was a millionaire accountant who had worked at Lockheed Martin and according to an unverified copy of his voter’s registration…he was Democrat. He owned guns that most people can’t afford. He owned machine gun type weapons and it was his 2nd Amendment right to own them.

My beef is that Liberals don’t want law abiding citizens to own a gun they can afford. Restrictive gun laws didn’t stop Paddock, they just stop the average citizen.
Although most of the black people on Chicago’s east side are Democrats, I don’t think there are too many millionaires there where crime has skyrocketed and propelled Chicago to one of the nation’s most deadly cities…with the most restrictions on owning a gun.
Criminals of any race can and will get guns no matter what laws Democrats put in place. Only law abiding people follow laws…and that leaves them vulnerable to becoming victims. Why do Democrats want middle-class people to be victims?
Millionaires and billionaires can buy any kind of gun they want and slaughter whoever they want, wherever they want it seems. An average citizen who’s a Democrat or a Republican can at least have a chance with a cheap .38 special.

They can protect themselves and their families. When it’s time to try to protect you and your family, something is better than nothing…isn’t it? Having nothing at a time when you need something, will probably get you killed. Someone please tell me why Democrats hate black people and the middle-class?

Why I voted for Donald J. Trump

Prior to my late conversion about a month before the election, you couldn’t find too many people who did not want Trump to be our Republican nominee more than me. I still have the memes in my downloads to prove it. Then one day I had an epiphany. My guy Cruz was out. We were left with four choices.

Trump, Hillary, someone else or don’t vote. I couldn’t ‘not vote’. So that left Trump, Hillary or someone else. “God, what am I supposed to do?”, I asked. Then I asked myself, “What if Obama had not beeupside-down-marinen elected in 2008 or again in 2012?”

Would our economy be better? Would some of the people burned alive in cages or beheaded be alive today? Would Kate Steinle and some of the other people needlessly killed be alive had those illegals not been here but in Mexico instead?

Would the police officers who’ve been killed by the BLM narrative be at home with their families today? It’s something we’ll never know. The survivors of these victims will never know either…because Obama did win in 2008 and again in 2012.

Those wins set in motion the things we’re seeing today…so it wasn’t just “a vote”. No, it was much more than that. It was a matter of real people and the aftermath of decisions people made on those election days in 2008 and 2012.

On November 8, 2016, my vote would affect the outcome of people’s lives around the world in ways I can only imagine. So God, my principles chose life and a better future for anyone who in that future would have found themselves living or about to be killed under the long lasting affects of a Hillary Clinton presidency.

My personal principles regarding Trump’s sometimes offensive behavior had to take a back seat to some principles that I felt were much more important than the here and now.