r960-949a9e6ccdba71c1bf4012fddba0561e.jpg


Minority Leader Nancy Pelosi accused the head of the House Intelligence Committee of “stonewalling” an investigation into the Trump administration’s ties to Russia.

Earlier Monday, Intelligence Committee Chairman Rep. Devin Nunes, R-Calif., told reporters that there was “nothing there” when it comes to the connection between Russian officials and Trump’s administration and campaign officials, although he noted the investigation was still in its early stages. He also warned against a “witch hunt” against private citizens.

Pelosi, during a press conference at the National Press Club, took issue with several parts of Nunes’ statements to the press. She said, if he knows there is nothing to the allegations of Russian ties to the Trump administration through classified briefings, he should not be disclosing that to the press.

More broadly, she accused him of failing to investigate the matter fully before coming to a conclusion that there is “nothing there.”

“If he knew that from classified information, he shouldn’t be saying that,” she said. “If he won’t investigate, then he can’t possibly know. This is called stonewalling.”

“What are Republicans in Congress afraid of? We haven’t looked into it but we know there’s nothing there? I mean, please, it’s just ridiculous,” she said. “I know the House and Senate Intelligence committees are trying to work in a bipartisan way, and we should give them the time” to do it.

Pelosi is a longtime member of the House Intelligence Committee. As the top House Democratic leader, she also is one of the eight members of Congress who receive classified briefings on the most sensitive government issues and national security challenges.

Minority Leader Nancy Pelosi accused the head of the House Intelligence Committee of “stonewalling” an investigation into the Trump administration’s ties to Russia.

Earlier Monday, Nunes told reporters that there was “nothing there” when it comes to the connection between Russian officials and Trump’s administration and campaign officials, although he noted that the investigation was still in its early stages. He also warned against a “witch hunt” against private citizens.

Top Intel Dem: Too soon to allege Trump campaign-Russia collusion

Also from the Washington Examiner

“We’re not in a position to reach any conclusions” yet, Schiff said.

02/27/17 3:56 PM

Pelosi, during a press conference at the National Press Club, took issue with several parts of Nunes’ statements to the press. If he knows there is nothing to the allegations of Russian ties to the Trump administration through classified briefings, he should not be disclosing that to the press, she said.

More broadly, she accused him of failing to investigate the matter fully before coming to a conclusion that there is “nothing there.”

“If he knew that from classified information, he shouldn’t be saying that,” she said. “…If he won’t investigate, than he can’t possibly know. This is called stonewalling.”

“What are Republicans in Congress afraid of? We haven’t looked into it but we know there’s nothing there? I mean, please, it’s just ridiculous,” she said. “I know the House and Senate Intelligence committees are trying to work in a bipartisan way, and we should give them the time” to do it.

The California Democrat is a longtime member of the House Intelligence Committee and still serves on the panel. As the top House Democratic leader, she also is one of the eight members of Congress who receive classified briefings on the most sensitive government issues and national security challenges.

Ryan: 'Intel committees' should handle Russia probe

Also from the Washington Examiner

House Speaker Paul Ryan says congressional intelligence committees should be left in charge of investigating Russia’s cyber activity during the 2016 election.

“The proper place, in my opinion, is the intelligence committees because they’re the ones who have access to methods of intelligence gathering,” Ryan told reporters at the White House Monday afternoon.

The Wisconsin Republican had been asked to weigh in on Congressman Darrell Issa, R-Calif., who suggested over the weekend that the Justice Department appoint a special prosecutor to investigate ongoing questions about Russia’s hack-and-release operations and alleged contacts between Moscow and aides to President Trump.

“This is sensitive information that involves

02/27/17 3:54 PM

Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer also lit into the GOP chairman of the Senate Intelligence Committee for reports that the Trump administration asked him — and that he agreed — to talk to reporters from the Wall Street Journal and Washington Post to knock down details of a New York Times story in mid-February that asserted that Russian officials had multiple contacts with Trump campaign officials.

“I am very disappointed in Chairman [Richard] Burr’s contacts when the administration asked him to contact news organizations,” Schumer said at the same NPC event. “It certainly gives the appearance, if not the reality, of a lack of impartiality.”

Schumer said he has talked to the ranking Democrat of the panel, Sen. Mark Warner, D-Va., who he said has “put Burr on notice” that if the Democrats on the panel don’t think the investigation is thorough enough or “going after” the information it should, they will ask for a different type of probe by a select committee.

“So Burr is on notice because what he did is wrong and this is not the way to conduct a fair and impartial investigation that goes where the facts lead,” he said.

During the firestorm over former national security adviser Mike Flynn’s conversation with the Russian ambassador about news sanctions imposed by the Obama administration, Burr pledged to launch an investigation and follow the facts where they lead.

House and Senate Democrats have called for an independent commission to investigate the personal, political and financial ties between Trump, his associates and aides and Russia.


“It’s very important for the American people to know the truth,” Pelosi reiterated Monday. “Why else would [Trump] be putting Putin on a pedestal? Why would he be undermining the [Strategic Arms Reduction] treaty? What is this about?”



Source link

About the Author:

Leave a Reply