The Secret Service is weighing how far to take its disciplinary action against a senior special agent who suggested she would rather do jail time than take “a bullet” for President Trump.

The agency on Tuesday said it has taken “appropriate action” against Kerry O’Grady, who is the special agent in charge of the Denver office, but has not indicated whether she has been placed on administrative leave, which would be forced leave with pay, a common first disciplinary step when the Secret Service is taking a behavioral incident seriously.

“The U.S. Secret Service is aware of the postings and the agency is taking quick and appropriate action,” a spokesman said in a statement. “As a matter of practice, we do not comment on personnel matters.”

“All Secret Service agents and employees are held to the highest standards of professional and ethical conduct. Any allegations of misconduct are taken seriously and swiftly investigated,” the spokesperson added.

The Washington Examiner reported Tuesday that O’Grady made several derogatory Facebook posts about Trump over the past seven months, including one in which she endorsed Hillary Clinton and said she would endure “jail time” rather than “taking a bullet” for what she regarded as a “disaster” for America and women and minorities.

The Secret Service initially told the Washington Examiner that they were looking into the matter but then didn’t respond to questions about whether she would be disciplined.

One person familiar with the matter told CNN Tuesday night that the Secret Service is trying to find out if she posted the information while she was working, which would be a clear violation of the Hatch Act. The Hatch Act bars federal employees from engaging in some forms of political activity, especially while at work on when using any form of their professional role.

Secret Service employees are part of a group of federal employees that face more severe Hatch Act restrictions, including these two rules:

— May not post a comment to a blog or a social media site that advocates for or against a partisan political party, candidate for partisan political office, or partisan political group.

Report: State Department reviewing $221 million payment to Palestinians

Also from the Washington Examiner

The payment infuriated Republicans, and now the Trump administration is looking into the action.

01/25/17 8:16 AM

— May not use any email account or social media to distribute, send or forward content that advocates for or against a partisan political party, candidate for partisan political office, or partisan political group.

Trump tornado hits Washington

Top Story

The Trump administration’s frenetic pace right out of the gate has confounded Democrats.

01/25/17 12:01 AM

Source link

About the Author:

Leave a Reply