r960-87cd0dbf80fb02ce80cc54f5918ccc08.jpg


WikiLeaks founder Julian Assange mocked the Obama administration’s unclassified report on the cyberattacks against the Democratic party during the 2016 elections, and called it “a press release” that failed to prove Russia was behind the hacks.

The unclassified report stated that Russian President Vladimir Putin ordered the hacks as part of “an influence campaign” designed to “denigrate” Hillary Clinton, who had impugned the fairness of the 2011 Russian elections that kept Putin in power. It did not publish the evidence for these assessments, and cited the need to protect “sensitive sources or methods,” but it was released after President-elect Trump received a briefing on the classified version of the report.

“It is frankly quite embarrassing to the reputation of the U.S. intelligence services to be putting out something that claims to be a report like that,” Assange said Monday morning in a press statement broadcast on social media. “This is a press release. It is clearly designed for political effects, as U.S. intelligence services has been politicized by the Obama administration in the production of this report and a number of other statements.”

Assange, who published the Democratic National Committee emails and released messages from Clinton campaign co-chairman John Podesta’s private account throughout the fall, said U.S. intelligence agencies failed to prove that Russian intelligence intended to help Trump, even if they were the ones who carried out the attacks.

“If we look at what I think is the clearest politicization of the report, it is those parts which reference Russian state intentions in relation to Donald Trump,” he said. “No evidence of anything is presented anywhere [in] the report, but, to me, it seems that the critical question here is whether the allegation is that Russian intelligence services themselves or people under their direction hacked the Democratic national party or John Podesta with the intent of favoring Donald Trump.”

Intent is an important question for U.S. policymakers as well, but not because they dispute the Russian government was behind the hacks. Instead, they argue that Russian goals in carrying out the attacks are a key factor in calibrating U.S. retaliation.

“So when you put in place sanctions, you’ve got to make sure you’re sanctioning a country for doing something that you yourself are not doing,” Senate Foreign Relations Chairman Bob Corker, R-Tenn., said Friday. “That’s pretty important.”

Assange, who once hosted a show on the Russian-government run media network RT and previously advised National Security Agency leaker Edward Snowden to seek refuge in Russia, reiterated that he did not get the messages from the Russian government. He declined to say if he could rule out that his sources for the messages were in Russian government intermediaries, and cited the need to protect his sources.

“We can’t play 20 questions with our sources, gradually narrowing down the ambit of who they are,” Assange said. “We’re concerned about protecting our sources. … If our sources were, for example, a state, we would have a lot less concern in attempting to protect them.”

Poll: Majority of Americans want Supreme Court to interpret the Constitution as 'originally written'

Also from the Washington Examiner

Just 40 percent of respondents thought the court should focus on what the “Constitution means now.”

01/09/17 11:14 AM

His criticisms of the report notwithstanding, Assange did note that the intelligence agencies confirmed the authenticity of the emails he released. “In this case, the Podesta and the [Democratic National Committee emails are authenticated not just by us . . . but now also by the CIA, FBI, NSA, and [the Office of the Director of National Intelligence],” he said.

Democrats planning to stall Trump's Cabinet nominees

Top Story

A slew of nominees will appear before the Senate.

01/09/17 12:01 AM



Source link

About the Author:

Leave a Reply