House Republicans want a federal court to not allow two Obamacare customers to continue fighting a lawsuit over the legality of the law’s payments to insurers.

The House filed a response Wednesday to an emergency motion filed earlier this month over its lawsuit involving Obamacare’s cost-sharing reduction payments to insurers, which are used to reduce copays and deductibles for low-income Obamacare customers.

A federal judge ruled this year that the Obama administration bypassed Congress to fund the cost-sharing payments. The White House appealed that decision, but it looks doubtful that President-elect Trump will continue the appeal since he has pledged to repeal the law.

At first, it appeared after the election that the federal ruling would stand. However, in December, two Obamacare customers who are aided by the reduction in copays and deductibles filed a motion to intervene and continue the lawsuit if Trump doesn’t.

House Republicans said in a motion Wednesday that the customers have no “legal interest at stake in this appeal.” It added that the customers’ supposed harm is “unsubstantiated and entirely speculative and would not be affected by the relief they seek in any event.”

The filing adds that the customers wouldn’t be affected if Obamacare is repealed and the cost-sharing reductions are eliminated. The current plan for the GOP-controlled Congress is to immediately repeal Obamacare but leave it intact for a few years until a replacement is created and implemented.

The response adds that insurers are required to provide the cost-sharing reduction payments under Obamacare.

However, eliminating funding for the payments could lead to insurers to raise rates to cover the extra costs.

It is not clear if Congress would eliminate cost-sharing funding or leave it in place alongside the rest of Obamacare’s tax credits while a replacement is crafted.

Dem attorneys general threaten lawsuits if Trump repeals climate plan

Also from the Washington Examiner

Fourteen attorneys general asked Trump to defend the Clean Power Plan instead of getting rid of it.

12/29/16 12:19 PM

The lawsuit centers over how the cost-sharing payments should be funded.

Obamacare’s tax credits are funded through a permanent appropriation, meaning that Congress doesn’t approve the exact level of funding like it does with other programs.

The administration argued that the cost-sharing payments are under that permanent appropriation, but the House successfully argued in its lawsuit that the law doesn’t say that.

Dem AGs threaten lawsuits if Trump repeals climate plan

Top Story

Fourteen attorneys general asked Trump to defend the Clean Power Plan instead of getting rid of it.

12/29/16 12:19 PM

Source link

About the Author:

Leave a Reply