It’s a case of “hello-goodbye” on cybersecurity policy: House Freedom Caucus member Mick Mulvaney, R-S.C., is poised to pick up a major cyber portfolio as President-elect Trump’s pick to run the Office of Management and Budget.

And Sen. Tom Carper of Delaware is leaving the top Democratic spot on the homeland security panel, where cyber was a key priority, to focus on environmental issues.

Mulvaney at OMB will inherit a share of the responsibility for securing federal computer networks and will make decisions on cyber spending, one of the most significant growth areas in the federal budget in recent years.

Major funding increases have gone toward upgrading the government’s own cybersecurity, pursuing hackers, coordinating with the private sector on the issue and cyber research.

The South Carolina budget hawk will have vast influence over Trump’s spending proposals and is a fierce advocate of clamping down on government spending. The budget-tightening agenda pushed by Mulvaney and the Freedom Caucus helped trigger the downfall of former Speaker John Boehner, R-Ohio.

It remains to be seen how Mulvaney’s budget-cutting approach would affect cyber programs, a consistent growth area in President Obama’s budgets and in the final spending packages passed by Congress.

The Obama administration’s fiscal 2017 proposal included $19 billion for federal cybersecurity activities, a 35 percent increase over the previous year. A chunk of that was directed toward law enforcement and other programs favored by the Republican congressional majority, but more scrutiny may be coming under an OMB Director Mulvaney for this long-favored budget area.

On another note, Mulvaney wanted the bipartisan and industry-favored Cybersecurity Act of 2015 to expire after seven years.

“What if we have the balancing act wrong?” Mulvaney asked at the time, saying Congress needed a hard trigger to come back and review legislation that set the terms for government-industry sharing of cyberthreat intelligence.

PLO negotiator: Trump could kill peace process with Jerusalem embassy

Also from the Washington Examiner

Saeb Erekat damned President-elect Trump’s selection of David Friedman as ambassador.

12/20/16 12:09 AM

The sunset amendment was strongly opposed by industry groups, which invested heavily in passing the underlying law with its accompanying legal protections for companies that share cyberthreat indicators.

Mulvaney expressed concerns about the civil liberties implications of the info-sharing proposal, but also cited the need for a legal framework allowing sharing between government and the private sector.

Without the law, Mulvaney wrote to a constituent, “if the government was aware of information about a computer attack that could affect the commercial sector, it is currently illegal for the government to tell companies like Amazon or Walmart about it, due to the classified nature of the intelligence. By the same token, if Walmart became aware of a cyberthreat against its own networks that could affect a government or military site, it could not tell the government about it.”

But, he added, “I recognize the possibility that I could be wrong about all of this,” and therefore pushed the sunset provision.

The final version of the law, passed in December 2015, included a compromise 10-year sunset.

On expensive Pentagon programs, McCain and Trump just might get along

Also from the Washington Examiner

President-elect Trump and the chairman of the Senate Armed Services Committee may be able to find common ground.

12/19/16 11:01 PM

A key sponsor of that law was Sen. Carper, who was the chairman and then ranking member of the Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs Committee as the legislation was being developed and pushed in the 113th and 114th Congress.

Carper, who is giving up his position as ranking member of homeland security to take the top Democratic slot at Environment and Public Works, discussed the state of cyber policy in an exclusive interview with InsideCybersecurity.com on Dec. 14.

“I worked with [now-retired ranking member] Tom Coburn, R-Okla., on how to get better results for less money,” Carper said. “We decided to work on FISMA” — the law governing federal network security — “which had been largely a paper exercise previously. That reform was very difficult and took most of our first year.”

After extensive discussions with Homeland Security Secretary Jeh Johnson, Carper and Coburn also advanced legislation to improve DHS’s ability to attract and retain “cyber warriors,” Carper said.

And they crafted and passed a bill to make DHS’s cyberthreat intelligence sharing center “a real entity.”

Those were the first significant cyber policy measures to pass Congress after the issue had bogged down along largely partisan lines in earlier years — and as the Edward Snowden leaks made it politically difficult for lawmakers to address any measure related to cyber.

The bills were variously described as “housekeeping” measures or building blocks.

But they set the stage for passage of cyber information-sharing legislation, which was crafted under the direction of the Senate Intelligence Committee in 2015.

Last year, Carper said, “We had a challenge with [Intelligence Chairman Richard Burr] seeing my committee as an equal partner.”

Carper made the argument that info-sharing conducted through a Department of Homeland Security portal would lend consistency and a level of comfort to industry, which would get liability protection for exchanging threat indicators.

“Working out a compromise on that was enormously satisfying,” Carper said — and ultimately the key to final passage of the Cybersecurity Act of 2015.

Asked whether he believed cybersecurity would be a high priority for the Trump administration, Carper noted that Trump brought it up “from time to time” on the campaign trail as an important issue.

Carper also praised the selection of retired Marine Corps Gen. John Kelly for DHS Secretary, calling this “a great choice.”

And Carper’s advice to the next president?

“You have one chance to put together a great team — don’t blow it.”

Charlie Mitchell is editor of InsideCybersecurity.com, an exclusive service covering cybersecurity policy from Inside Washington Publishers, and author of “Hacked: The Inside Story of America’s Struggle to Secure Cyberspace,” published by Rowman and Littlefield.

Wisconsin's red realignment

Top Story

The state’s vote for Trump shouldn’t be a surprise; it’s been trending GOP for years.

12/19/16 11:01 PM

Source link

About the Author:

Leave a Reply