r960-daa4356fe02d88f5af8658c904b8ee1f.jpg


Senior Trump administration officials have begun their appraisal of visa screening measures so that stricter procedures are ready once the legal battle over the president’s travel ban has run its course.

The revamped vetting proposal is likely to include inspection of travelers’ social media activity, a direct response to terrorist acts in which perpetrators had made their intent or extremist sympathies known online before it was too late.

“DHS is on top of this, and the White House will be receiving regular updates and then returning to the agencies with their input,” a senior administration official told the Washington Examiner. “I don’t know about State or other places, but Secretary [John] Kelly is a former Marine, and a Marine executes an order as soon as it’s given.”

Agencies are working flat out to put new policies in front of the president by the end of the 90-day suspension of travel from seven terrorist-ridden countries in the Middle East.

A source with knowledge of the review said officials are looking at a variety of “flaws” in the current process, such as time limits on interviews with visa applicants and privacy restrictions that prevent immigration adjudicators from inspecting foreign nationals’ social media postings.

“These are the kinds of things that they will be addressing aggressively to make common sense the standard by which we facilitate these measures,” the source said, adding that some officials believe immigrants seeking entry into the country have in many cases been “afforded more rights than U.S. citizens” under the existing system.

In the executive order, the president requested an interagency review of existing screening measures to “ensure that adequate standards are established to prevent infiltration by foreign terrorists or criminals.” The review was to take place during the 90-day period of suspended immigration and include officials from the Departments of Homeland Security and State, along with representatives from an assemblage of other agencies.

Under the current vetting system, individuals seeking refugee or asylum status in the U.S. must register with the United Nations, pass a series of security checks, interview with State Department contractors, pass another background check (sometimes two), complete an in-person interview with a DHS officer, participate in a cultural orientation course and pass one final security check at an American airport upon arrival.

The entire process takes one to two years on average, and only about half of all applicants every year go on to receive approval, according to the State Department.

Schumer, Sanders call for rallies against Obamacare repeal

Also from the Washington Examiner

“The Republican Party’s plan to repeal the Affordable Care Act is in chaos,” they wrote.

02/11/17 10:28 AM

Even so, the current and previous administrations have said U.S. law enforcement officials are often unable to fully vet individuals because they are coming from war-ravaged countries with limited criminal databases for authorities to check.

“We did discover, in people who had come in as refugees from Iraq, a number of people who were of serious concern, including two that were charged when we found their fingerprints on improvised explosive devices from Iraq,” FBI Director James Comey admitted in congressional testimony last fall.

“There’s no doubt that that was the product of a less-than-excellent vetting that had been done on Iraqi refugees,” he added.

To avoid similar episodes or worse, conservative immigration experts are urging agency officials involved in the review process to recommend something akin to the ideological evaluation Trump proposed when he first coined the phrase “extreme vetting.” Mark Krikorian, executive director of the Center for Immigration Studies, suggested preparing “a bare-bones statement of values” for immigrants to sign “as a precondition of their visas.”

“The provisions of such a contract would have to be simple and to-the-point: ‘I believe in the legal equality of men and women.’ ‘I believe that people are free to follow or leave any religion they choose, or follow no religion at all.’ ‘I believe that people have the right to criticize prophets and other religious figures, even if that criticism is unfair or incorrect,'” Krikorian said, previewing what such a statement might look like.

Report: Flynn aide forced out of National Security Council after CIA denies security clearance

Also from the Washington Examiner

CIA Director Mike Pompeo reportedly approved the rejection of Townley’s clearance request

02/11/17 10:21 AM

“It will put in black and white our rejection of Islamic supremacism. That may upset some of our ‘allies,’ but that’s too bad,” he added.

Trump, the “America First” president, has expressed similar sentiments while defending his travel ban against its myriad critics and promising to implement more secure screening policies.

“America is a proud nation of immigrants, and we will continue to show compassion to those fleeing oppression,” the president recently declared. But at the end of the day, Trump said his “first priority will always be to protect and serve our country.”

Exclusive: Internal poll says Dems can sway voters against Gorsuch

Top Story

The summary of the poll said there is “limited initial support for Gorsuch.”

02/11/17 12:54 AM



Source link

About the Author:

Leave a Reply


Fatal error: Allowed memory size of 134217728 bytes exhausted (tried to allocate 80 bytes) in /home/conserv/public_html/wp-includes/wp-db.php on line 1837