Day: February 3, 2017

r960-n_daae97f85d15ebaa7b1598dc054f7e19.jpg

Obamacare enrollment sluggish in final weeks


Last-minute Obamacare enrollments dropped significantly this year compared to last year, as the debate over Republican vows to repeal and replace the law heats up.

A total of more than 9.2 million people selected health plans on the federal healthcare.gov website during its fourth annual enrollment season, the administration announced Friday. But just around 400,000 people signed up in the last two weeks, compared to nearly 700,000 signups in the final week of enrollment last year.

Republicans quickly jumped on the announcement to broadcast their dire analysis of the law. Kevin Brady, chairman of the Ways and Means Committee which is working on an Obamacare repeal bill, said the numbers only partially reflect what he sees as the law’s failings.

“The enrollment numbers released today only tell a fraction of Obamacare’s disappointing story — for instance, the fact that these numbers are the result of a law that forces Americans to sign up for insurance they don’t want or need,” Brady said in a statement. “These numbers also don’t show that costs are soaring, access to the care people want is shrinking, choices of insurers are dwindling, and taxes are rising.”

Supporters of Obamacare have chastized a decision by President Trump’s administration to scale back Obamacare outreach and advertising once he took office, with just a week and a half remaining in the signup season. They charged that it was an effort to sabotage the program by depriving it of customers, particularly the young and healthy ones who are critical to the program and tend to sign up at the last minute.

“There is no doubt that enrollment would have been even higher if not for the uncertainty caused by political attacks on the law, and the Trump administration’s decision not to provide consumers with all of the resources and support available to help them enroll,” said Anne Filipic, president of Enroll America.

It’s still unclear whether the Obama administration’s goal of nearly 13.8 million plan selections will be met, as the total doesn’t include enrollments from the 12 states running their own marketplaces.

The announcement from the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services had a marked change of tone from the Obama administration, which had often sought to cast the healthcare law in the most positive light. CMS instead emphasized some of healthcare.gov’s shortcomings, noting that premiums rose overall and there were fewer plans available for purchase.

“Those selections were made from a market that experienced a 25 percent increase over the previous year in the average premium for the benchmark second-lowest cost silver plan as well as a 28 percent decline in the number of issuers participating over the past year,” the announcement said.

Trump responds to refugee ban critics: The 'citizens of this country are my total priority'

Also from the Washington Examiner

President Trump’s second weekly address hit six topics, encompassing top news from the week.

02/03/17 6:00 PM

Health and Human Services spokesman Matt Lloyd said the administration looks forward to replacing the healthcare law.

“Obamacare has failed the American people, with one broken promise after another,” Lloyd said. “We look forward to providing relief to those who are being harmed by the status quo and pursuing patient-centered solutions that will work for the American people.”

Of the 9.2 million signups, about 3 million were from new customers and about 6.2 million were returning customers.

Puzder's ex-wife disavows prior claims of domestic violence

Top Story

Puzder’s ex-wife said that she falsely made the charge during their divorce due to her anger over their break-up.

02/03/17 5:01 PM



Source link

r960-6b360383664c326946d0ccc4b0b03e75.jpg

Poll: Trump's job approval rating lags behind his predecessors


This marks the highest disapproval rating of any new commander in chief in recent history. (AP Photo/Susan Walsh)

More than half of the public disapproves of President Trump’s job performance during his first few days in office, according to a CNN/ORC poll released Friday.

Fifty-three percent of Americans said they are unimpressed with Trump’s handling of his job after a jam-packed two weeks that saw 19 executive orders and several hiccups inside the administration. This marks the highest disapproval rating of any new commander in chief in recent history.

Only 10 percent self-identified Democrats approve of the president’s performance, while a full 90 percent of Republicans believe he is on the right track. For comparison, former President George W. Bush held a 57 percent approval rating at this point during his first term, with only a quarter of Americans disapproving.

While other polls have shown Trump garnering wide support for his decision to halt immigration from seven Muslim-majority countries, the CNN/ORC survey found that 53 oppose the executive order. Another 60 percent oppose the president’s pledge to build a wall along the southern border.

Nearly 80 percent of voters said Trump has so far behaved the way they expected he would as president, with 21 percent saying his handling of the job has surprised them.

The survey of 1,002 U.S. adults was conducted between Jan. 31-Feb. 2. Results contain a margin of error plus or minus 3 percentage points.

Obamacare enrollment drops significantly in final weeks

Top Story

Just around 400,000 people signed up in the last two weeks, compared to nearly 700,000 signups last year.

02/03/17 4:48 PM

Subscribe to Alerts

Learn more about Washington Examiner’s Alerts

Loading Next Article



Source link

r960-9ae5c435c0f911130cdf56bbfbb15630.jpg

Pelosi loses in 2-1 vote upholding ban of embattled student artwork


House Minority Leader Nancy Pelosi made a vigorous but ultimately futile argument on Friday to keep student artwork hanging near the Capitol that portrays police as pigs, noting other politically themed paintings remain on the wall.

The controversial painting was selected as part of a student art competition in Rep. William Lacy Clay’s district. The Missouri Democrat hung it in the Capitol, and Republicans immediately demanded that it should be taken down.

After the Architect of the Capitol agreed the painting should be removed, Pelosi appealed the decision to the House Office Building Commission. Pelosi herself sits on that panel, which also includes House Speaker Paul Ryan, R-Wis., and House Majority Leader Kevin McCarthy, R-Calif.

The panel rejected her appeal in a 2-1 vote, as Ryan and McCarthy voted to uphold the Architect’s decision, and Pelosi voted to reverse it.

Pelosi argued that there were other paintings hung in the Capitol showing “subjects of contemporary controversy” that were not removed. She specifically noted a portrait of Sen. Bernie Sanders, I-Vt, who ran in the Democratic primary against Hillary Clinton, a painting depicting a “bleeding immigrant with a black eye,” and a picture showing an American flag beneath a pair of Converse sneakers.

“I asked the HOBC to agree that removing the painting was wrong and the Architect’s decision should be reversed,” Pelosi wrote in a letter to Clay. “I regret that the majority of the HOBC chose to uphold the Architect’s decision.”

The painting by Clay’s constituent had been displayed on the wall for seven months before GOP lawmakers became incensed and removed it several times. Clay then replaced it until the Architect stepped in and took it down permanently, citing a rule prohibiting “subjects of contemporary political controversy or a sensationalistic or gruesome nature.”

But Pelosi called the repeated removal of the Clay painting by GOP lawmakers “embarrassing” and the Architect’s decision to take it down permanently as “unprecedented,” noting it is the first time artwork has been removed from the wall since the contest began in 1982.

Pelosi pointed out that the artwork was approved for the wall and then disqualified retroactively, months later.

Obamacare repeal hurts opioid abuse fight, Democrats say

Also from the Washington Examiner

23 senators say gutting the law would pull $5.5 billion in one year for addiction and mental health services.

02/03/17 3:57 PM

Pelosi also cited a point made by Clay in an earlier letter to Ryan that suggests removal of the painting violates the First Amendment.

Ryan’s office issued a statement Friday noting the ruling of the HOBC and that the rule disqualifying the painting was initially instituted in 2007, when Pelosi was serving as House speaker.

Read Pelosi’s letter to Clay here:

So about Trump supposedly not recording his phone call with Vladimir Putin

Also from the Washington Examiner

So is there a recording or isn’t there? That’s a great question, and I’m not sure what the answer is.

02/03/17 3:09 PM

Democrats want Trump to release membership list for Mar-a-lago

Top Story

Dems want information to “dispel any suspicions” that the wealthy are purchasing access to the president.

02/03/17 1:37 PM



Source link

r960-b749f067cb4a99440da243e458d0f831.jpg

White House dodges on Pence's plans for DeVos vote


The White House on Friday refused to say whether Vice President Mike Pence is planning to be in the Senate early next week in case he’s needed to help get Betsy DeVos confirmed as President Trump’s secretary of education.

Republican Sens. Susan Collins and Lisa Murkowski announced earlier this week that they will not vote for DeVos on the Senate floor, and unless a Democrat decides to support her, Pence would be needed to break a possible 50-50 tie and get her confirmed.

When asked about this possibility, White House spokesman Sean Spicer said only that the administration would do all it can to ensure she is confirmed.

“I hope that vote gets 60, 70 votes,” Spicer said. “She is an unbelievable, remarkable woman who has fought very hard to improve our nation’s education system and to make sure that school are serving children.”

“I think that we’re going to make sure we do everything we can, and we feel 100 percent confident that she will be confirmed Monday night and be the next secretary of education,” he said.

Republican leaders are confident that DeVos will prevail in the vote scheduled for Monday evening, but as of Friday, it seemed likely that Pence would be needed.

Early Friday morning, the Senate voted 52-48 to end debate on DeVos, setting up a vote early next week. But in that vote, Collins and Murkowski are not expected to support her. If they vote “no” on the nomination and nothing else changes, the result would be a 50-50 tie assuming all senators vote.

White House won't rule out military action against Iran after sanctions

Top Story

“I would never rule anything off the table,” Sean Spicer said regarding the possibility of military action against Iran.

02/03/17 1:04 PM



Source link

r960-b11e564724019c854cd66f02f61f3fef.jpg

F-35 cost drops to below $100 million per plane for first time


The government has reached an agreement with Lockheed Martin for the 10th batch of F-35 aircraft, bringing the cost of one variant below $100 million per plane for the first time.

The cost of this batch is $728 million less than the last one, a drop of nearly 8 percent, Lockheed said in a statement.

President Trump on Monday took credit for driving the cost down, although experts pointed out that the savings were on their way before he took office. The Lockheed statement thanked Trump for his involvement but stopped short of saying he reduced the cost.

“President Trump’s personal involvement in the F-35 program accelerated the negotiations and sharpened our focus on driving down the price,” Lockheed said. “The agreement was reached in a matter of weeks and represents significant savings over previous contracts.”

Reaching that cost milestone means the price has dropped about 60 percent per plane from the first lot of aircraft, a natural result of manufacturers learning as they go and increasing efficiencies.

“The LRIP-10 contract is a good and fair deal for the taxpayers, the U.S. government, allies and industry,” said Lt. Gen. Chris Bogdan, F-35 program executive officer. LRIP refers to low-rate initial production. “We continue to work with industry to drive costs out of the program.”

The tenth lot is for 90 aircraft, including 55 for the U.S. military and 35 for international partners and customers the United Kingdom, Norway, Australian, Turkey, Japan, Israel and South Korea.

In this lot, an F-35A, the variant used by the Air Force and international partners, will cost $94.6 million. The B version used by the Marine Corps, which can take off and land vertically, will cost $122.8 million. And the C version that can take off and land from Navy aircraft carriers will cost $121.8 million. All three variants saw a drop in price.

The Pentagon awarded a $6.1 billion contract for the ninth batch of 57 low-rate initiation production aircraft in November after Lockheed and the department failed to reach an agreement to award contracts for lots nine and 10 together.

The press just can't help itself when it comes to salacious gun-related headlines

Also from the Washington Examiner

The press predictably botched the story with deeply unfair and misleading headlines.

02/03/17 1:46 PM

The cost per plane has gone down in each lot as Lockheed learns lessons that make future work go more quickly and smoothly. The cost also goes down as the service buys more planes since the one-time costs of production are spread between more airframes.

President Trump, who has repeatedly taken on the expensive F-35 acquisition program on Twitter, has met with Lockheed Martin CEO Marillyn Hewson multiple times since the election. Both times, she promised the president that she would work to bring the cost down “significantly.”

“He asks excellent questions and he’s really focused on making sure that the cost comes down on the program,” Hewson said in a call to report the company’s 2016 fourth quarter earnings. “It’s not about slashing our profit, it’s not about our margins. When we have those discussions, it’s about how do we get the cost of the aircraft down today and in the future.”

The program is the most expensive ever undertaken by the Pentagon, at a cost of about $1 trillion, though that number covers the entire life cycle of the platform.

Democrats demand Mar-a-Lago membership list

Also from the Washington Examiner

Dems want information to “dispel any suspicions” that the wealthy are purchasing access to the president.

02/03/17 1:37 PM

White House won't rule out military action against Iran after sanctions

Top Story

“I would never rule anything off the table,” Sean Spicer said regarding the possibility of military action against Iran.

02/03/17 1:04 PM



Source link

r960-e62f15946a9bae3f0f3a8aed5bc630c5.jpg

Report: Pence is going to the Super Bowl


He's the fourth sitting VP to go to the Super Bowl. (AP Photo/Pablo Martinez Monsivais)

Vice President Mike Pence is scheduled to attend Sunday’s Super Bowl between the Atlanta Falcons and the New England Patriots, according to CNN.

Pence will join former President George H.W. Bush in attendance at the Super Bowl. Bush is set to perform the coin toss before the game.

Pence is the fourth sitting vice president to attend the game. Spiro Agnew, Bush and Al Gore all also attended the game when they were vice president.

Security is likely going to be even tighter for the game with Pence in attendance. The Super Bowl, one of the most-watched television events of the year, is already one of the most secure events for the Department of Homeland Security and the presence of high-ranking elected officials usually ramps up those procedures.

Democrats proving powerless to stop President Trump's Cabinet

Top Story

Senate Democrats have little to show for trying to stall President Trump’s nominees ahead of a bruising Supreme Court confirmation fight.

02/03/17 4:00 AM

Subscribe to Alerts

Learn more about Washington Examiner’s Alerts

Loading Next Article



Source link

r960-1bb3037d60048ebc9dfec617e8fe4e0b.jpg

Air Force F-35 performing well against 'complex' threats in first Red Flag exercise


The Air Force’s variant of the F-35 is doing “very, very well” at its first Red Flag training exercise, where it’s facing advanced threats at Nellis Air Force Base in Nevada.

Lt. Col. George Watkins, the 34th Fighter Squadron commander, said Thursday that 13 F-35As from Hill Air Force Base are participating in Red Flag and had flown 110 missions so far.

While the F-35B, the Marine Corps variant that can take off and land vertically, participated in last year’s iteration of the exercise, this is the first showing for the A variant, which takes off and lands on a runway. It’s the version being purchased by the Air Force as well as most international partners, such as Australia and the United Kingdom, which also participated in the exercise.

The Lockheed Martin fifth-generation joint strike fighter’s kill ratio was 15 aggressors killed for every one F-35 taken out, but Watkins stressed that a perfect ratio would signify that the training exercise wasn’t hard enough and wouldn’t benefit pilots trying to prepare for combat.

“If we didn’t suffer a few losses, it wouldn’t be challenging enough, so we’d have to go back and redo it. So there are some threats out there that make it through because of their sheer numbers and the advanced threats that they’re shooting at us. So we have had one or two losses so far in our training,” he said. “That’s good for the pilots.”

Watkins flew F-16s in four previous Red Flag exercises, and said the threats faced in 2017 were “significantly more complex and aggressive” than in past years.

“I’ve never seen a Red Flag like this where they put up as many advanced threats against us,” he said.

President Trump has criticized the F-35 for being so expensive and has had direct conversations with Lockheed Martin’s CEO, Marillyn Hewson, to work to reduce costs. He has also suggested that he would promote competition for future fighter jets between Lockheed Martin and Boeing, which makes the fourth-generation F/A-18 Super Hornet, and said that he asked Boeing to price out a version of the Super Hornet that’s comparable to the F-35.

Asked to compare the two platforms, Watkins refused to do so, saying that it’s “apples to oranges,” a sentiment echoed by former service leaders as well.

Chelsea Clinton takes swipe at Kellyanne Conway over 'Bowling Green Massacre'

Also from the Washington Examiner

Chelsea Clinton took a swipe at White House senior adviser Kellyanne Conway on Friday for wrongly referencing a “massacre” that actually never took place.

In a tweet on Friday morning, Clinton referenced an attack in France and said: “Very grateful no one seriously hurt in the Louvre attack …or the (completely fake) Bowling Green Massacre. Please don’t make up attacks.”

Very grateful no one seriously hurt in the Louvre attack …or the (completely fake) Bowling Green Massacre. Please don't make up attacks.

02/03/17 12:09 PM

“From my perspective, the F-35 has been living up to what it was expected to do,” Watkins said.

Democrats proving powerless to stop President Trump's Cabinet

Top Story

Senate Democrats have little to show for trying to stall President Trump’s nominees ahead of a bruising Supreme Court confirmation fight.

02/03/17 4:00 AM



Source link

wex-logo_1200x630-facebook.jpg

Former Obama Justice Department official in new ad: 'I'm 100 percent comfortable with Judge Gorsuch'


The Judicial Crisis Network unveiled a new ad on Friday showing an Obama administration Justice Department official saying, “I’m 100 percent comfortable with Judge Gorsuch becoming our next Supreme Court justice.”

Jane Nitze, who worked for the Justice Department and clerked for left-leaning Supreme Court Justice Sonia Sotomayor, boosted President Trump’s Supreme Court nominee, who Nitze clerked for in 2008 and 2009.

“I don’t think folks on the left should be concerned about Judge Gorsuch becoming a Supreme Court justice,” Nitze says in the ad. “He is extraordinarily fair-minded. He will approach each case the same regardless of the issue or the parties before him. And he will have a great deal of respect for folks on all sides of the ideological spectrum.”

The ad will run on television in Colorado and Washington, D.C., and three predominantly red states where Democratic senators are up for re-election in 2018: Indiana, Missouri, and North Dakota. The ad is part of the first-phase of a $10 million campaign pushing for Gorsuch’s confirmation to the high court.

Democrats proving powerless to stop President Trump's Cabinet

Top Story

Senate Democrats have little to show for trying to stall President Trump’s nominees ahead of a bruising Supreme Court confirmation fight.

02/03/17 4:00 AM

Subscribe to Alerts

Learn more about Washington Examiner’s Alerts

Loading Next Article



Source link

r960-54b99aa363a6f1ec2726fb69717201e1.jpg

The media badly mangled Trump's statement on Israel


When the Trump White House issued a statement Thursday night articulating the new administration’s stance on Israeli settlement construction, my initial reaction was that it was a radical departure from the Obama administration’s policy and perhaps the most sympathetic statement to Israel on the issue ever to come from a U.S. president.

So it was quite astonishing to read a front page article in the New York Times that began, “President Trump, after promising a radical break with the foreign policy of Barack Obama, is embracing some key pillars of the former administration’s strategy, including warning Israel to curb settlement construction …”

Given that many other media outlets have taken the same line and how much confusion this has caused, it’s important to spell out how much of a departure the Trump statement was from Obama’s policy.

Obama, when he came into office, argued that to achieve peace in the region, there had to be “daylight” between the U.S. and Israel. If the U.S. was not seen as so reflexively pro-Israel, he argued, it would make the U.S. a more credible peace broker. To achieve this daylight, he began his presidency by demanding that Israel freeze all housing construction, even as Jewish families grew in communities around the Israeli capital of Jerusalem.

By the end of his administration, Obama allowed the U.N. Security Council to pass a resolution that declared all Israeli housing beyond its original borders to be illegal – a standard that treats the Western Wall, the Jewish holy site, as illegally occupied territory. Secretary of State John Kerry then followed up with a lengthy speech in which he lashed out at Israel. “No one thinking seriously about peace can ignore the reality of what the settlements pose to that peace,” he said. And he boasted that throughout the Obama administration, “We have made countless public and private exhortations to the Israelis to stop the march of settlements. I mean literally hundreds of conversations with Prime Minister Netanyahu…”

So, compare this to what has happened under Trump. In the week since Trump has taken office, Israel has announced 5,500 new housing units, and there had been no public statements condemning the activity.

Then, on Thursday, the Jerusalem Post reported that the Trump administration had told Israel to cease any more announcements while advocating support for a two-state solution. But that report cited an anonymous source, so there’s no way of knowing if that person was authorized to explain the actual position of the Trump administration. All I am going on below is the public statement issued by the White House after that report. So, it’s worth quoting the entire statement, and then taking it piece by piece.

“The American desire for peace between the Israelis and the Palestinians has remained unchanged for 50 years,” the statement read. “While we don’t believe the existence of settlements is an impediment to peace, the construction of new settlements or the expansion of existing settlements beyond their current borders may not be helpful in achieving that goal. As the President has expressed many times, he hopes to achieve peace throughout the Middle East region. The Trump administration has not taken an official position on settlement activity and looks forward to continuing discussions, including with Prime Minister Netanyahu when he visits with President Trump later this month.”

There are several things that immediately jump out as being a radical departure from the Obama White House. First, while the statement mentions the “desire to peace,” at no point does it mention a two-state solution, let alone describe it as the only way to achieve peace. Second, it says, “we don’t believe the existence of settlements is an impediment to peace.” That’s a major break with Obama, who viewed settlements as a central obstacle.

Trump administration imposes sanctions on 13 people, 12 companies in response to Iranian ballistic missile test

Also from the Washington Examiner

Iran’s missile launch on Jan. 29 provided Trump with the first real test of his foreign policy toughness.

02/03/17 10:22 AM

The next clause is the closest that the administration comes to criticism, and it’s what the media jumped on: “the construction of new settlements or the expansion of existing settlements beyond their current borders may not be helpful in achieving that goal.” But again, if you pick it apart, it’s quite tepid. Firstly, it’s using the conditional “may not be helpful” rather than an affirmative “is not helpful.” Secondly, taking issue with the construction of new settlements still leaves room for the building of new homes within the borders of existing settlements. This statement, in other words, is compatible with allowing hundreds of thousands of Jews to remain in settlements that the Obama administration believed illegal, and then allowing wiggle room to grow within the current boundaries.

If that’s not enough, the statement goes on to state that the administration has not taken an official position and looks forward to talking with Prime Minister Netanyahu about it. So in other words, even the mild suggestion that expansion of settlements (which are not an obstacle to peace) might not be a good idea, should not be seen as a formal demand to cease that activity.

Not only is this sort of rhetoric mild compared to Obama, it’s arguably more tepid than any administration in history.

Even George W. Bush’s administration, considered by many to be the most pro-Israel president in U.S. history, was critical of settlements, even though he eventually came to acknowledge that at least some Jewish presence beyond Israel’s 1949 borders was inevitable. In 2002, for instance, the 20021125173854safi@pd.state.gov0.773205.html#axzz4XdWdbeJQ”>Bush State Department said, “settlement activity has severely undermined Palestinian trust and hope, preempts and prejudges the outcome of negotiations, and in doing so, cripples chances for real peace and prosperity. The US has long opposed settlement activity and, consistent with the report of the Mitchell Committee, settlement activity must stop.”

To be clear, it’s early in a new administration, and Trump still has plenty of time to evolve on the issue. We certainly cannot say, based on one statement, where he’ll end up.

Will refugees displace native workers?

Also from the Washington Examiner

Ottumwa has about 1,000 unemployed people. That’s an unemployment rate of about 8.5 percent.

02/03/17 10:18 AM

But for now, it’s incredible that anybody who follows the issue could take the Trump statement to signal he’s adopting anything close to the Obama era policy.

Democrats proving powerless to stop President Trump's Cabinet

Top Story

Senate Democrats have little to show for trying to stall President Trump’s nominees ahead of a bruising Supreme Court confirmation fight.

02/03/17 4:00 AM



Source link

r960-7d5a1bc9d51d682bcb677323596531f4.jpg

Secret Service: Reports of top-level resignations 'absolutely false'


The Secret Service is denying that two senior Secret Service managers were abruptly forced to resign Thursday night.

“The report regarding the Secret Service personnel is absolutely false,” an agency spokeswoman said Friday.

She referred all further questions to the White House press office, which did not immediately respond to a request for comment.

Steve Clemons, a longtime left-wing think tank writer who now serves as the Washington editor at large of the Atlantic and National Journal, issued a string of tweets late Thursday night saying that at least two senior Secret Service managers were “abruptly forced to resign” and were escorted out of the Eisenhower Executive Office Building, the building adjacent to the White House.

Clemons suggested that the move was an effort by the Trump administration to reshuffle the agency’s top leadership but stressed that that was only “speculation.”

Clemons is on a plane to Tokyo and could not be reached for comment.

His tweets about an incident at the EEOB involving two Secret Service managers came a week and a half after the Washington Examiner first reported that the top agent in Denver wrote in a Facebook post she would rather face “jail time” than “take a bullet” for Trump.

Kerry O’Grady, the agent in question, explained herself saying she viewed Trump’s presidential candidacy as a “disaster” for the country and especially for women and minorities.

Hoyer: 'Who knows' when Trump is going to offend another US ally next

Also from the Washington Examiner

“I think experience would tell us over the last 10 days, and frankly the last 15 months, who knows,” Hoyer said.

02/03/17 9:41 AM

After the Washington Examiner’s report, O’Grady was placed on paid leave while the agency’s Office of Professional Responsibility investigates her social media activity.

Democrats proving powerless to stop President Trump's Cabinet

Top Story

Senate Democrats have little to show for trying to stall President Trump’s nominees ahead of a bruising Supreme Court confirmation fight.

02/03/17 4:00 AM



Source link