r960-59fc0e662eba576dd75de34e738b2ac4.jpg


Sometimes we forget that mining continues to be a significant part of the United States economy. With several thousand mines operating nationwide, the U.S. is able to produce precious metals like gold and silver, as well as zinc, copper and iron needed to manufacture electric vehicles and solar panels. All of these mines provide good-paying, middle-class jobs for more than 130,000 workers across the country.

Unfortunately, a number of mining operations could face a real threat, thanks to an unnecessary new proposal from the Environmental Protection Agency that seeks to duplicate existing financial assurance requirements for mine reclamation.

Currently, mining states utilize specific programs to evaluate and approve the financial assurance required for mining companies. These states have a strong interest in seeing their natural resources adequately protected, and so, they employ staff to appraise and calculate financial requirements in conjunction with federal laws overseen by the Bureau of Land Management and the U.S. Forest Service. This system has worked well for decades, with federal and state laws evolving along the way to rectify any deficiencies and to ensure the highest level of environmental protection is achieved.

Now, however, the EPA is developing a new rule to require additional financial assurance for the hardrock mining industry. Like many regulations, this one sounds reasonable — requiring mineral miners to demonstrate the financial ability to clean up anything that could potentially contaminate land or water. This ensures environmental risks are being managed and paid for by companies, not taxpayers.

This very reasonable approach is exactly what states and the federal government are already doing. Therefore, the new EPA proposal makes no sense.

This heavy-handed approach by the EPA has already raised the concerns of governors and congressional committees overseeing these same regulations. They worry that, not only has the EPA failed to study the issue thoroughly, but the imposition of a redundant financial assurance requirement could put a number of mines out of business.

For example, Hecla Mining Company, a 125-year-old silver mining company, has successfully permitted, built and closed multiple mines in the U.S., bringing much-needed economic benefits to rural economies. However, with a drain on financial resources caused by the proposed EPA requirements, it’s less likely Hecla could have built these mines at all.

What’s particularly troubling is that the nation’s existing mineral mines currently provide an absolutely crucial array of resources needed to help domestic manufacturers compete in the 21st century economy. Minerals like copper, zinc, gold, silver and molybdenum are crucial for the construction of hybrid cars, electronics and wind turbines.

Troublingly, the U.S. is now completely import-dependent for 19 key minerals and more than 50 percent dependent for another 24 important minerals. The last thing the nation needs is a new layer of federal regulations that makes mining more difficult, deepens the country’s already-dangerous dependency on foreign mineral supplies and puts thousands of good-paying jobs at risk.

Read the most interesting Clinton WikiLeaks emails

Also from the Washington Examiner

Here are some of the most noteworthy findings to date.

10/19/16 12:01 AM

Phillips Baker is CEO of Hecla Mining Company and the incoming chairman of the National Mining Association. Thinking of submitting an op-ed to the Washington Examiner? Be sure to read our guidelines on submissions.

Scandals surround Hillary Clinton's gatekeeper at State

Top Story

Republicans aren’t surprised at all that Undersecretary of State Patrick Kennedy is in the middle of the latest Hillary Clinton email scandal.

10/19/16 12:01 AM



Source link

About the Author:

Leave a Reply