With both major-party candidates deeply disliked by voters, Libertarian Party candidate Gary Johnson took to the New York Times opinion page to make the case for why Americans should choose a third party this November.

Johnson’s op-ed is mostly positive, focusing mainly on his policy ideas while taking just a couple specialized shots at his opponents Hillary Clinton and Donald Trump. Johnson, who didn’t poll high enough to make the debate stage Monday night, says that his Libertarian Party ticket is the only one that offers Americans “a chance to find common ground.”

Johnson and his running mate, Bill Weld, suggested they are fiscal conservatives but social liberals. Johnson vetoed more than 750 bills as governor of New Mexico, and said he believes “government does too much and costs too much.” He also scolded the treatment of black Americans by police officers and advocated for criminal justice reform.

“What would government be like in a Johnson administration?” he asked. “First, we would begin the conversation about the size of government by submitting a real balanced budget. Every government program would have to justify its expenditures, every year.”

He added: “Cuts of up to 20 percent or more would be on the table for all programs, including military spending. Changes to Social Security and Medicare must also be considered.”

Johnson called Trump’s immigration proposals “ludicrous,” and implied that a Libertarian president wouldn’t deport “noncriminal undocumented immigrants” or build a wall. He also knocked Clinton on foreign policy for her “muddled mix of intervention, regime change and bombing campaigns.” These, Johnson wrote, created the disasters in Afghanistan, Iraq, Libya and Syria.

Johnson and Weld have some hurdles to clear besides name recognition, fundraising and an absence from the debates. Their acceptance of policies from both sides of the aisle could turn some voters off.

The Left might find those last proposals unacceptable, while the Right might find Johnson’s stance on abortion and religious freedom (as it relates to marriage equality) hard to swallow.

Still, with so many voters dismayed by the major party choices, holding one’s nose to vote for Johnson might be better than selling one’s soul to Clinton or Trump.

Seniors to pay more for Medicare Part D next year

Also from the Washington Examiner

Premiums for the 10 most popular drug plans expected to rise 4 percent.

09/28/16 12:05 PM

Ashe Schow is a commentary writer for the Washington Examiner.

FBI chief downplays immunity grants in Clinton email case

Top Story

Republicans used the hearing to press Comey on why Clinton was allowed to bring Cheryl Mills to her own interview.

09/28/16 10:04 AM

Source link

About the Author:

Leave a Reply